Edited by R. Allen Leider
January 15th, 2010
''The Book of Eli" Reviewed by CJ Henderson, Andrew Johnson.
Edited by R. Allen Leider
![]() |
Well, here’s one that I have to admit, I’m not sure
I can explain. It follows a parade of Apocalpyse films that are popular
grist for the entertainment mill of late. It has an excellent cast, with
nary a one of them phoning in their performance. It has a superb set of
folks behind the camera as well. By all rights this should be great and
grand competition for "Avatar." And yet, it’s not. Hell, this isn’t even
competition for "Blind Date." A 12 year old can guess the gimmicks by the
end of the first reel if they pay attention and the few plot twists only
enable the Hughes boys to keep this one afloat.
Now, understand that I went to see this one with not high expectations, but with a certain level of hope. Denzel Washington, always a good performance. Gary Oldman is one of the finest actors the world has today, and is playing a villain for the first time in years. This certainly had promise. Well, I’ve had promises made to me before. Talk, however, is cheap. And movie tickets are not. But taste is not universal, so let me tell you about "The Book of Eli" and let you make your own mind up about it. |
| The Story: It’s the future, somewhere in the
Western United States, thirty years in the future. Things have collapsed
as they seem to be doing a lot in films these days, but in a new and interesting
way. Everything seems dead, as if the world is one big desert. Where there
once were forests, now there are only decayed trunks. Grass, running water,
color--all we’ve come to take for granted have somehow disappeared.
All the audience is told is that there was a war--possibly a religious
war coming to an end when the "flash" came and 'tore a hole in the sky'.
The sun then poured through the gap in the ozone layer and toasted the
Earth. All vegetation was burned away, people were blinded and died by
the millions. The world was turned into a barren cinder in a heartbeat,
and hasn’t recovered much since. Few people read anymore and survival is
a 24/7 concern.
[PLEASE NOTE: The next few paragraphs contain spoilers. If you’re determined to see this picture, stop reading NOW! Across this wasteland comes a loner - Eli ( Denzel
Washington). He is walking wests because a voice in his head told him to
do so. Thirty years earlier, after the "flash," this voice told him to
take a particular book and start walking west. Because of the religious
nature of the war, people thought the Bible started the war, so every Bible
in the world was destroyed except the one Eli has. The voice also told
him it would lead him to the place he needed to be, and protect him along
the way. So, after thirty years of walking, Eli is almost to the
Pacific Coast. But, not more than a tankful of gas from his destination,
he comes to the ruins of a small town ruled by Carnegie (Gary Oldman),
a maniac desperate to find a Bible. He wants one because once he has it’s
holy words to quote, he is certain everyone will flock to him and do precisely
what he wants. Eli only wants a local shopkeeper ( Tom Waits ) to recharge
his iPod battery, but suspicion that the stranger carries a book tarbels
fast. Of course, Eli can’t give up his Bible because, ahhhh ... I guess
the voice wouldn’t approve. And so, conflict ensues. Carnegie runs
the townlike a mob boss, and is served by two female slaves, his mistress,
the blind Claudia
I know it sounds as if I’m describing some sort of "For Christians Only" production, but I don’t really think the film is aimed at anyone in particular. The God of this story certainly isn’t the usual "God of love." If it supposed to be God’s voice driving Eli, it’s a God who swept the world clean with fire instead of a flood. This is the picture’s major flaw. It simply doesn’t know what it’s about. The acting is fine. Locations, sets, costuming, all creative and competently handled. The special effects are good as they come. But the movie simply doesn’t add up to anything. Is Eli under God’s protection? If he is, why does it take him thirty years to walk across the country? Why does he have him make this journey just so the Bible can reach a mysterious destination. There are more unanswered questions, but the above should be enough. Is it a science fiction film or a religious come on--I don’t know. Why was there a war, what was the "flash," how can there still be canned goods, gasoline and gunpowder left after three decades? Sadly, it seems the likely answer is someone in Hollywood started to think about their vomitus life style in conjunction with what that was doing to their immortal soul, and decided to try and cop a plea-bargain with the Almighty. Something like--"Hey, Lord, forgive me my sins now that I’m getting old and I’ll make a movie that’s like all reverent and stuff. Deal?" Yes, I know that was a fairly cruel thing for me to say, considering someone may have actually thought they were doing God’s work by making this sad, tired bundle of nonsense. But then, it was fairly cruel of them to cut all the exciting action scenes into the trailer and not give us the slightest clue of how deadly dull and boring the other nine tenths of the film were. I wish it were otherwise, but this one is pretty much a waste of time. Our final word: 1 star out of 5. |
And here's Andrew Johnson's take on this film:
| Again, a film that shows the downer future with humans
reverting back to the Dark Ages. But there seems to be a hero and savior
coming into the picture who will thwart one villain in control of the ghastly
existence of one particular town. Denzel Washington is Eli, our hero, while
Gary Oldman, in roles he does so best, is Carnegie, the villainous town
dictator.
It’s 30 years after the really big war that destroyed civilization and civility. Devastation is everywhere as cities are empty, highways and bridges destroyed, and the earth seemingly not fit for habitation. This was once America, but now gangs control the roads, murdering, raping and plundering travelers. Canniballism is not uncommon for survival. No one is safe. Along comes Eli, a man of peace who will stop anyone if challenged using maximum force if necessary. With ninja skills and a machete he can dispatch a dozen attackers before you can unwrap your Snickers. Eli seems to have a hope for the future and is committed and guided by his faith and belief. But first, he must lock horns with the ambitious Carnegie who like the town boss of the classic westerns leads a band of gunmen and thieves . Carnegie is after one particular book - the one that Eli possesses and carries with him. It seems that after the destruction of the war, people lost faith, blamed organized religion for the conflict and burned all the Bibles. Eli seems to have the only known remaining copy of the King James bible on Earth. Carnegie’s adopted daughter Solara (Mila Kunis) is fascinated by Eli and realizes there could be something better in Eli’s concept of a different way of thinking. Is there help in this ravaged human existence and can Eli bring it all about for a better world? It’s good vs. evil once more with action and annihilation. Eli is an everyman guided by his faith. He confides to Solara that a voice had led him to uncover the Bible he possesses which was hidden under rubble. He is going West to find a place for it, why or where he’s not quite sure. Carnegie is also looking for this book as he feels he can gain even more power over people by the words in scripture. At one point, Eli reflects that people before the great war had no idea what was precious and discarded what they now fight over to possess. Food and especially water are scarce commodities and bartering and trading is the order of the day. ( This is one of the morals of the story that is delivered with a sledge hammer ). The tale, especially its finale, is fascinating, quite original, and eye-popping and entrancing with its washed out, muted colors and bleak vistas. Despite the graphic brutality and slaughter, it’s a most interesting endeavor, well paced and directed by the Hughes Brothers. The only point I’d like to make, without giving away the ending, is that when you truly learn all there is about Eli, the things he was able to do previously appear to be quite a stretch. But going along with the flow, “THE BOOK OF ELI” is a fine bit of cinematic storytelling well worth your time at the movies. PS – Watch at the end for an uncredited cameo appearance of a fine actor who has a small pivotal role in the story. Trivia - Kristen Stewart turned down Mila Kunis's
role due to scheduling conflicts with New Moon and Denzel Washington performed
all of his own stunts for the hand to hand fight sequences
|
The Players: Denzel Washington, Gary Oldman, Mila Kunis, Ray Stevenson, Tom Waits, Michael Gambon and Jennifer Beals.
The Filmmakers:
Directed by Albert and Allen Hughes
Screenplay: Gary Whitta
Released by Warner Brothers
![]() |
Christopher Plummer as Leo Tolstoy. Helen Mirren as
Countess Sofia, his loving wife for many years. Paul Giamatti as Chertkov,
a disciple of Tolstoy’s philosophy trying to wrangle money out of the great
writer when he dies for his own movement and agenda. James McAvoy as Valentin,
the young and gullible new assistant to Tolstoy, who will have an awakening
and transformation from serving as informant for Cherkov to seeing all
things clearly in Tolstoy’s life and in his very own. With such a cast
and subject presented, you just know a film can’t go wrong. It doesn’t.
“THE LAST STATION” tells of the last days in the renowned writer’s life. After 50 years of marriage, his wife feels threatened by the conspiracy that will change Tolstoy’s will in leaving everything, the writings and great fortune her husband has amassed, to the movement. This would leave Sofia and family with nothing to speak of. And even Tolstoy himself is going along with this. Cunning and plotting, Chertkov really knows how to manipulate and influence the man who has been called one of the greatest writers in history with his “War and Peace” and so many other classics of the literary stage. |
| As Tolstoy’s wife, muse, passionate lover, and
secretary (who had copied the mammoth “War and Peace” by hand six times),
she finds her world threatened. She despises Chertkov who may have secretly
convinced her husband to sign a new will leaving the rights to his novels
to the people rather than to his family. Righteous outrage takes hold of
her. Tolstoy has renounced his noble title, his property, and possibly
his family, in favor of vegetarianism, poverty, and even celibacy (but
there is a question concerning the latter if indeed he lived by this).
This, after she’s given him thirteen children. Her behavior becomes extreme
in the face of disaster, and Chertkov persuades Tolstoy of the damage she
will do to his glorious legacy.
The film’s title, “THE LAST STATION,” refers to the railroad stop where Tolstoy will breathe his last. Written and directed by Michael Hoffman, based on the novel by Jay Parini, the film is a rich and intelligent tale concerning the writer’s fame and final days. Shown is the commune fostering his aims nearby, and the paparazzi of the time hanging out at the gate of his estate. Even newsreel footage (especially with the film’s closing credits) of the real Tolstoy and the times greatly add to the overall effectiveness of the motion picture. “THE LAST STATION” can be called an epic tale of loyalty and betrayal, well acted, well directed, and giving the viewing audience a perspective into the later life of the eminent Russian writer and how he reacted to family, friends, and associates. Two romances actually encompass the story, one near its end, the other just beginning. A complex, rich, emotional, and yes, humorous story is presented concerning how difficult it is to live with love and how it is impossible to be without it. Not for a moment do you lose interest or attention as to what is being woven on screen. This film had a one-week run in December for Academy consideration at Oscar time. Indeed, it could very well be nominated in several categories. “THE LAST STATION” is worth seeing. PS – In the musical score to the film, I thought I noticed romantic piano strains from that marvelous Italian film several years ago, “IL POSTINO” (“THE POSTMAN”). |
The Players: Helen Mirren, Christopher Plummer, James McAvoy, Paul Giamatti, Anne-Marie Duff, Kerry Condon, John Sessions, and Patrick Kennedy
The Filmmakers:
Written and Directed by Michael Hoffman Based on the
novel by Jay Parini
Director of Photography: Sebastian Edschmid
Composer: Sergey Yevtushenko
Released by Sony Pictures Classics
![]() |
Kids under 12 will find this formula family spy film
amusing fare for a rainy day and Jackie Chan fans will see anything the
Chinese martial arts star does. It's a familiar concept, I think Schwarzenegger
and The Rock both did something like it years ago.
The Story: CIA spy Bob Ho (Chan) is working a tough case with his partners Glaze ( George Lopez ) and George ( Billy Ray Cyrus ). Russian spies Creel ( Katherine Boecher ) and Poldark ( Magnus Scheving ) trying to obtain a formula that will turn oil to dust and therefore, make the possessor of this formula very rich. But right in the middle of his assignment Bob decides to retire and he takes on his toughest assignment to date: looking after his girlfriend Gillian's ( Amber Valetta ) three kids, Farren ( Madleine Carroll ) Ian ( Will Shadley) and cutie pie Nora ( Alina Foley ) who haven't exactly warmed to their mom's beau. When one Ian accidentally downloads the top-secret oil/dust formula, Bob's longtime nemesis pursues him and the kids and finally pays a visit to the family. There are gadgets galore and in the tradition of ''Spy Kids'' a happy ending. I doubt there will be a sequel however. |
The Players: Jackie Chan, Amber Valleta, Madeline Carroll, Will Shadley and Alina Foley
The Filmmakers:
Directed by Brian Levant
Screenplay: Jonathan Bernstein and James Greer
Released by Lionsgate
